Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:55:38 +0000 From: Hugo Silva <hugo@barafranca.com> To: Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, kellydeanch@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Why is procfs deprecated in favor of procstat? Message-ID: <4D65582A.7020404@barafranca.com> In-Reply-To: <20110221174100.GA77744@icarus.home.lan> References: <457880.36028.qm@web121501.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <201102211707.p1LH7c8n075660@lurza.secnetix.de> <20110221174100.GA77744@icarus.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> For years now I have been considering a sysctl filesystem (e.g. mounted > as /sysctl) which would solve this dilemma. Read-only might be a wise > choice for this too. But this is beyond my skill set at this time, and > the existing documentation/examples for a pseudo filesystem are really > not that great. > http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?mount_sysctlfs++NetBSD-current
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D65582A.7020404>