Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 05:34:56 +0100 From: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> To: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>, des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What are people using for MUA's nowadays? Message-ID: <5.0.2.1.1.20030929053024.02ce0008@popserver.sfu.ca> In-Reply-To: <a06001a16bb9ca20093ce@[10.0.1.4]> References: <xzpisndgqk1.fsf@dwp.des.no> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0309271138260.459@a.shell.peak.org> <2493.67.85.96.168.1064692382.squirrel@www.wingfoot.org> <a06001a05bb9ba8d12cb8@[10.0.1.4]> <xzpisndgqk1.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 16:35 28/09/2003 +0200, Brad Knowles wrote: >At 12:23 PM +0200 2003/09/28, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: >> The proper Unix thing is a single LF. DOS and Windows use the CR/LF >> combo; CR alone is a Mac convention. > > I remembered that CR/LF were used in there somewhat, but=20 > obviously was wrong in where they were used. Sigh.... > > Makes you wish that there were international standards for these= =20 > things that everyone had to follow. ;) International standards, such as the RFCs? Every text-protocol RFC I've= =20 seen has been pretty clear about requiring CRLF pairs. Colin Percival
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.0.2.1.1.20030929053024.02ce0008>