Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 19:29:18 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru> To: Mike Makonnen <mtm@identd.net> Cc: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Subject: Re: Making a dynamically-linked root Message-ID: <20030603122918.GA53376@regency.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <20030603122226.BGPM11703.pop018.verizon.net@kokeb.ambesa.net> References: <20030603113927.I71313@cvs.imp.ch> <16092.35144.948752.554975@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20030603115432.EGLB13328.out002.verizon.net@kokeb.ambesa.net> <16092.36129.388194.477452@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20030603122226.BGPM11703.pop018.verizon.net@kokeb.ambesa.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 08:22:25AM -0400, Mike Makonnen wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 07:57:21 -0400 (EDT) > Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> wrote: > > > > > Ok, maybe a webserver is a bad example. But you must admit that > > /bin/sh is commonly used outside the startup scripts. > > Yes, I agree. But... > > So far I think the arguments against it are two-fold: > > 1. Performance > 2. What happens if I hose one of the libraries? > > I think Gordon has already answered them adequately: > > 1. If you don't want it, turn it off Plus numerous people mentioned that they have local patches that yield performance boost substantially enough (5 secs and more). ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030603122918.GA53376>