Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 23:16:12 +0200 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: ticso@cicely.de Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base. Message-ID: <86wt0n3mxv.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20070407203411.GJ8831@cicely12.cicely.de> (Bernd Walter's message of "Sat, 7 Apr 2007 22:34:12 %2B0200") References: <20070406025700.GB98545@garage.freebsd.pl> <86k5wo55s0.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20070407203411.GJ8831@cicely12.cicely.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> writes: > On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 09:43:59PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > > ZFS is now also available on pc98 and amd64. > Great to read - is it just atomic.S missing for the remaining > architectures? Yes. Ideally, ZFS would use FreeBSD's atomic operations instead of its own. I believe that the reason it doesn't is (at least in part) that we don't have 64-bit atomic operations for i386. I have unfinished patches for cleaning up the atomic operations on all platforms; I'll dust them off and see what I can do. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86wt0n3mxv.fsf>