Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 May 2001 19:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com>
To:        bv@wjv.com
Cc:        Deepak Jain <deepak@ai.net>, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: OC48 interface
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.10105301928040.19174-100000@misery.sdf.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010530181630.A501@wjv.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Wed, 30 May 2001, Bill Vermillion wrote:

> On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 05:36:14PM -0400, Deepak Jain thus sprach:
> > 
> 
> > SONET is a physical layer protocol that (when implemented) can
> > provide switching around cut fiber in sub milliseconds. 
> 
> Nice when it works.  We lost our DS3 for about 18 hours 2 weeks
> ago.  Seventeen OC-48 links were cut.  When we asked the about the
> self-healing, they said, normally it would, but not with the many
> gone.

  I find it funny when people put redundant links right next to the
circuit it is protected.  Bundles get cut, not individual fibres.

  The whole idea of self healing ring, is that the redundant fibres be run
somewhere else entirely.  I know that AT&T Canada put a ring in recently
nearby.  The two paths are at least a 100 kilometres apart for most of the
distance.  When it enters the destination city, each path should be in a
separate conduit running down different streets.

Tom


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.10105301928040.19174-100000>