Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 18:16:31 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: smp@FreeBSD.ORG, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: system initialization order. Message-ID: <82447.968775391@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 13 Sep 2000 03:11:12 %2B1100." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009130310420.346-100000@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009130310420.346-100000@besplex.bde.org>, Bruce Evan s writes: >On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Bruce Evans wrote: > >> On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >... >> > init hardclock >> > enable hardclock interrupt >> >> Should be softclock (scheduler doesn't use hardclock). > >Oops, statclock. Uhm, the point was to get the timeouts working, not to enable forced rescheduling... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?82447.968775391>