Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:37:55 -0500 (EST)
From:      Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>
Cc:        John Indra <john@office.naver.co.id>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: -CURRENT is bad for me... 
Message-ID:  <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010212162702.5225B-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <200102122119.f1CLJaW31538@harmony.village.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Warner Losh wrote:
> To be blunt, the FILE * changes go too far, even for -current.

Other than having to installworld twice, I've had zero problems.
But I don't recompile my applications often, and am probably
still running things that depend on libc.so.4.

> Changes of this magnitude require a bump of the major number, even
> though we've already done that in -current.  It breaks nearly
> everything, including the upgrade path.  Alternatively, the locking
> changes need to be backed out.

Too bad ELF libraries don't have minor version numbers.  It's
a shame to waste a library version number.

> Alternatively, the upgrade path must be fixed.  We've managed to avoid
> extra special instructions in the vast majority of cases, and I don't
> want to start introducing them now.  It is the road to madness.  We
> tried that once before and the support load was too high.

I don't have the time or resources to fix the upgrade path.  If
someone else wants to, it would certainly be appreciated.

-- 
Dan Eischen


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.1010212162702.5225B-100000>