Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2003 11:44:35 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: "Alan L. Cox" <alc@imimic.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Removal of ENABLE_VFS_IOOPT Message-ID: <20030302194435.GA36383@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <3E625750.9319E291@mindspring.com> References: <3E619B26.DF1E4FC7@imimic.com> <3E624133.8FB21AA6@mindspring.com> <20030302185801.GA36138@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <3E625750.9319E291@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 11:11:12AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > Steve Kargl wrote: > > > Here's an idea... ask John Dyson about it. > > > > From John's comments in c.u.b.f.m, I doubt he > > follows the kernel development in 5.0 close enough > > to make any recommendation without studying the > > code. I further suspect that John would not want > > to spend the time require. > > It's a design question, not an implementation question. Alan's > suggestion is that the design be modified because (in his opinion) > the implementation is incomplete. I suppose Alan's suggestion to remove the code is a modification to the design. :-) > BTW: I think you are wrong about John; I guess you missed his > post to -chat last week? I don't read -chat. I do read c.u.b.f.m and John's statements leads one to conclude he doesn't follow the development close enough to make a design decision. -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030302194435.GA36383>