Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:38:35 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Patrick Bihan-Faou <patrick.bihan-faou@netzuno.com> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Non-executable stack Message-ID: <20051029023835.GA31831@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <4361CEB5.8050305@netzuno.com> References: <200510270608.51571.db@traceroute.dk> <200510271511.36004.db@traceroute.dk> <20051027195842.GA19013@ada.devbox.be> <200510272017.02565.db@traceroute.dk> <4361CEB5.8050305@netzuno.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 09:09:41AM +0200, Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote: > We are using the stack protection patches for GCC in production servers= =20 > running FreeBSD 4.11 and everything runs well. We are using a fairly=20 > large number of ports (from samba to php to postgresql, etc.) and none=20 > have shown issues with this feature. Several years ago when I last used this, X did not work when compiled with propolice, and there were problems with a couple of other ports that I forget now. Kris --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDYuCrWry0BWjoQKURAkuvAKCUx3XmVjwV/3YkOkoXOhCmHuVM6QCZAeBz jLP1xutuc3nbgdcFcx0jD/I= =esVm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051029023835.GA31831>