Date: Mon, 4 Mar 1996 12:53:06 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net> To: "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernel messages.... Message-ID: <199603041953.MAA21293@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <9603041948.AA13624@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> References: <199603041106.LAA00537@bsd.tseinc.com> <9603041842.AA12682@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> <199603041913.MAA21147@rocky.sri.MT.net> <9603041929.AA14006@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> <199603041934.MAA21175@rocky.sri.MT.net> <9603041948.AA13624@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> I don't want to remove it, because it indicates that some > >> configuration needs to be at least thought about. > > > And that configuration would be? > > The operator needs to consider how best to balance TCP performance > against memory usage. If you have a lot of memory, you can set the > parameters very high and get improved TCP performance on very busy > machines. If you don't have a lot of memory, you can set the > parameters very low and get improved memory utilization. Under normal > circumstances, you won't see the message. Is this documented anywhere except for this email message? *grin* Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603041953.MAA21293>