Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 07:45:26 -0600 From: Peter Schultz <pmes@bis.midco.net> To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: branches [was: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/firefox Makefile distinfo patch-build_unix_run-mozilla] Message-ID: <402B8376.7060206@bis.midco.net> In-Reply-To: <402B7AFA.8040606@mindspring.com> References: <200402110716.i1B7GH9D017803@repoman.freebsd.org> <xzpisidbtvn.fsf@dwp.des.no> <1076508074.88428.14.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20040211122704.X93022@blues.jpj.net> <xzpk72tiah1.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040211165940.Q98525@blues.jpj.net> <xzp4qtweqlf.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040212031228.E31447@blues.jpj.net> <20040212102842.GC3148@FreeBSD.org> <402B7AFA.8040606@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Are there stable and current branches of the ports tree? I wouldn't think so, because then I don't think there'd have to be such a critical ports freeze. Having a better audited ports tree would be nice, like the other day when on of nectar's security patches to gaim got blown away. Pete...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?402B8376.7060206>