Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 09:52:20 +0200 From: "Julian Stacey Jhs@jhs.muc.de" <jhs@jhs.muc.de> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU> Cc: Mike Hoskins <mike@adept.org>, Rudy <rudy@monkeybrains.net>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /kernel: Too many dynamic rules, sorry Message-ID: <200010250754.e9P7qLX29809@jhs.muc.de>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > Summer 1999 or before, > > I ran out of space for all my rules, I append my > > Julian, i think you are talking about a different thing. > > The original posting was referring to the stateful (aka dynamic) ipfw > rules, which were introduced in Jan2000. > > The patches which someone else mentioned were related to configuring > timeouts on stateful rules. > > Your patches just modify the increment in autonumbering ipfw rules. Yup, just a tiny change (after a lot of code scanning). > [and the only reason i spotted this is the "Summer 1999" ...] > > cheers > luigi Ah, sorry, my mail stream was disrupted so I came back on line half way through this thread, & off at a tangent, sorry ! (PS I have read about dynamic rules now I recall, but not tried them yet). Julian - Julian Stacey http://bim.bsn.com/~jhs/ Munich Unix Consultant. Free BSD Unix with 3900 packages & sources. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200010250754.e9P7qLX29809>