Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 12:15:04 -0400 From: Steve Tremblett <sjt@cisco.com> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: portversion weirdness Message-ID: <20020619121504.K7674@sjt-u10.cisco.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Any portupgrade gurus out there? When I run portversion, I see that well over half of my installed ports are listed with ">" (ie. installed version is more recent than version in /usr/ports). I am sure cvsup is updating /usr/ports for me, and I am sure "make index" is making /usr/ports/INDEX. pkgdb -F and pkgdb -u seem to work fine. I have a cvsup refuse file, skipping the following: ports/astro* ports/biology* ports/cad* ports/chinese* ports/french* ports/german* ports/hebrew* ports/japanese* ports/korean* ports/russian* ports/vietnamese* ports/ukrai* When making INDEX, there are some complaints about this, but it still proceeds: distribute-2.1.26: "/usr/ports/japanese/mimekit" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete gnuplot371+-1.2.0: "/usr/ports/japanese/vflib" non-existent -- dependency list i ncomplete kde-i18n-3.0.1: "/usr/ports/japanese/kde3-i18n" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete Should I maybe cvsup without the refuse file, make INDEX, and then delete the dirs I don't want? I can't use portupgrade until it properly understands the versions on my system, and I don't want to upgrade the spiderweb that is XF86 without it. Help please! :) -- Steve Tremblett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020619121504.K7674>