Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 Oct 2013 18:05:49 -0700
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To:        Cedric GROSS <cg@cgross.info>
Cc:        "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: [IWN] Review
Message-ID:  <CAJ-VmonFKQNxpk3h0q0n68SWrT0bpumxpq9xkdmDRti%2Boh8HXw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmokcf%2BCzs6bUUuj8aYr0maxKoSy2q-bLsyMzX%2BGPLXYwhA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <002701cebc6f$634c0040$29e400c0$@info> <CAJ-Vmokcf%2BCzs6bUUuj8aYr0maxKoSy2q-bLsyMzX%2BGPLXYwhA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
.. and I've just done the if_iwn_debug.h stuff, so you should update your
patchset to include that.

Thanks,



-adrian



On 23 October 2013 17:43, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Ok. I've reviewed this stuff in more depth.
>
> Split-6 is still way too big to commit as one commit.
>
> I was also hoping that we could get the updated hardware support into this
> without necessarily adding the PAN support. But, you're the one driving
> this, so it's up to you. :)
>
> * There's DPRINTF() and the debug flags that you've moved into
> if_iwnreg.h, which is the wrong place for it!
> * .. same as iwn_intr_str()
> * You still have style(9) issues:
>   + the "if" constructs should be if (), not if();
>   + you need spaces between things - eg, if (a == b) rather than if(a==b)
> or if (a==b);
>   + the } else { should be on one line, not separate on multiple lines.
>
> *  What's the story behind sc->ctx? When is it being set/changed?
> * And then there's also ivp->ctx; that's the current VAP context, right?
> If that's the case ,why are we bothering checking unit number? Why don't we
> consistently check the vap context?
>
> So, let's break up split_6 into this:
>
> * create if_iwn_debug.h; put the debug macros, enum and such into that;
> * submit a patch _just_ for the debug work, that's easy to do.
>
> * Then, fix up the style(9) issues.
> * Then, help me figure out what the story is with sc->ctx so I understand
> what's going on there. I'd like to try and remove that if possible.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> -adrian
>
>
>
> On 28 September 2013 10:23, Cedric GROSS <cg@cgross.info> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm get some free time. So I setted up my github for split work.
>>
>>
>>
>> So on https://github.com/KreizIT/FreeBSD-IWN/
>>
>>
>>
>> You will find 2 new branch : split_6 and split_7.
>>
>>
>>
>> Split_6 is iwn -HEAD with split 6 applied. Patch for that is also
>> available
>> in this branch.
>>
>> Split_7 is iwn -HEAD with split 6 and new split 7 applied.
>>
>>
>>
>> Split_7 start "parameters task". So no massive change except that it's
>> manage NIC without BT.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Cedric
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
>> freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>>
>
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmonFKQNxpk3h0q0n68SWrT0bpumxpq9xkdmDRti%2Boh8HXw>