Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 11 Apr 2013 23:03:57 +1000 (EST)
From:      Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
To:        mrboco@gmail.com
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, John Mehr <jcm@visi.com>
Subject:   Re: svn - but smaller?
Message-ID:  <20130411225319.M56386@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
In-Reply-To: <88b872cf-7795-4d69-91c7-6c3107299b33@googlegroups.com>
References:  <fa.HC5qzO0iN/yjyYjD7VV5PmQvhvc@ifi.uio.no> <fa.MRv3xfHTaOGpLpfASzsQON4/eTc@ifi.uio.no> <fa.wyARL8ZqTcETVtc9IbN/jffnuPE@ifi.uio.no> <fa.Tzd7N2eV1WeXmNrho7bucg2/0t8@ifi.uio.no> <fa.0htAnieJG4n/5yzdAG/An/SC7VE@ifi.uio.no> <fa.jFksxKaJZTqO9sKuozxeK5lHIlU@ifi.uio.no> <88b872cf-7795-4d69-91c7-6c3107299b33@googlegroups.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013, mrboco@gmail.com wrote:
 > On Sunday, March 24, 2013 9:57:12 AM UTC+6, Markiyan Kushnir wrote:
 > > Tested svnup for a while, and I can say it does its job well, and works 
 > > basically as I would expect, so thanks for your initiative. Although it 
 > > appears to be quite resource greedy. Most of the time it showed 
 > > something like:
 > > 
 > >   PID USERNAME    THR PRI NICE   SIZE    RES STATE   C   TIME   WCPU COMMAND
 > > 22270 mkushnir      1 102    0 44944K 31804K CPU0    1   6:22 97.56% a.out
 > 
 > It's because of typo in the send_command() procedure.
 > 
 > I've placed the patched svnup.c (0.56), the diff and two statically 
 > linked binaries on http://ftp.ufanet.ru/pub/boco/freebsd/svnup/
 > 
 > No more CPU eating and/or strange lockups (so far). Tested both 
 > against local and remote repository. 

I'm sorry, but even ignoring all of your whitespace and style(9) 
differences, your patch appears to go well beyond correcting a typo, 
which I can't spot anyway, though I'm sure John will know what it is.

Care to explain a little more?

Also, what advantage, in this particular case, is there in statically 
linking?  Here it turns a 21.5K i386 binary into one of 575K.  If this 
makes it into base, as I hope it may, that seems a little excessive?

cheers, Ian



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130411225319.M56386>