Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 3 Feb 2005 15:41:43 -0700
From:      Nick Pavlica <linicks@gmail.com>
To:        Nathan Vidican <nvidican@wmptl.com>
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Intel EMT64 Xeon vs AMD Opteron
Message-ID:  <dc9ba044050203144159443224@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <000001c50a3c$50f2eba0$6800000a@r3140ca>
References:  <000001c50a3c$50f2eba0$6800000a@r3140ca>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
I think this would depend on your application, but I have hear allot
of good things about AMD 64.

--Nick


On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:04:21 -0500, Nathan Vidican <nvidican@wmptl.com> wrote:
> Hey all,
> 
> Just looking for general opinions and/or advice regarding use of one over
> the other.
> 
> Cost wise, AMD Opteron 246 is roughly the same cost as a 3.0Ghz Xeon ... But
> how do they compare performance wise; specifically related to FreeBSD?
> 
> (Not subscribed to both lists I sent this to, please reply directly via
> email and cc the list if you could - thanks)
> 
> --
> Nathan Vidican
> nvidican@wmptl.com
> Windsor Match Plate & Tool Ltd.
> http://www.wmptl.com/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?dc9ba044050203144159443224>