Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 20:54:38 +0100 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai@bart.nl> To: Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Solicite review for KAME 10th patch] Message-ID: <20000113205438.C20217@lucifer.bart.nl> In-Reply-To: <20000114044825G.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp>; from shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp on Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 04:48:25AM %2B0900 References: <20000114044825G.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-On [20000113 20:50], Yoshinobu Inoue (shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp) wrote: > > -can put some feature until 14th midnight? >or > -can put some feature until 15th midnight? The 15th 00:00 Freefall time? >And I did it again, >I added a new function realhostname2() which is protocol >independent version of realhostname(), in libutil. > >If someone think these naming style should be changed, I think >it is best timing now. Please give me some proposal. >e.g. > bindresvport_sa() > realhostname_sa() I really prefer the _sa versions because the naming is less ambiguous from the 2 appended versions. I wonder what the others think. Has this been standardised somewhere already or are we now still in a phase, do what you want and after that we'll make a IPv6 API standard? Thanks for doing this shin. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator <asmodai@bart.nl> bART Internet Services / Tel: +31 - (0) 10 - 240 39 70 VIA NET.WORKS Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000113205438.C20217>