Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 09 Feb 2003 11:16:29 -0800
From:      Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
To:        phk@phk.freebsd.dk
Cc:        Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>, Jake Burkholder <jake@locore.ca>, Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: New kernel allocation API 
Message-ID:  <20030209191629.88B942A8B4@canning.wemm.org>
In-Reply-To: <25686.1044779463@critter.freebsd.dk> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
phk@phk.freebsd.dk wrote:
> In message <20030209075706.GO88781@elvis.mu.org>, Alfred Perlstein writes:
> 
> >I may see if I can convert some paths in the kernel to use zones. :)
> 
> I have a number of places where zones can be used instead of malloc,
> but since none of the places I have tried previously have resulted
> in measurable performance differences it has not been high on my
> agenda.

I'd be interested to know what it did to KVA usage on i386.  I would expect
to find a more efficient KVA utilization (and memory utilization) due to
better packing of objects instead of the power-of-two roundup that malloc
does.

Cheers,
-Peter
--
Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030209191629.88B942A8B4>