Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:08:22 +0100 From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org> To: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, Mikhail Teterin <mi+k@aldan.algebra.com> Subject: Re: flash9 checklist (was: flash-9, 10 on FreeBSD) Message-ID: <20081031090822.GA41624@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200810302250.m9UMoHpl014714@saturn.kn-bremen.de> References: <200810280859.24048@aldan> <20081028181731.GA30591@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <20081028205634.GA93288@freebsd.org> <20081029162105.18469pltiqtoqmao@webmail.leidinger.net> <200810302250.m9UMoHpl014714@saturn.kn-bremen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > we can expect problems in future > >when people dont mount linprocfs.. > > > >maybe we should put some checks into linuxulator... > > Or if we put something in browser startup scripts it also needs to > be in the native ones since those can use linux flash via wrappers > as well. the native ff + linuxflash uses linuxulator (ie. /compat/linux/proc) ? I dont think so... anyway, linprocfs does not seem to be optional anymore, we should reflect that somehow
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081031090822.GA41624>