Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 19:54:51 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: PseudoCylon <moonlightakkiy@yahoo.ca> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: negotiating HT params at assoc in sta mode Message-ID: <CAJ-VmokXVtzWLHEA=k0Fps7cRYFu%2BA82zk0gt4Y=iZsUyF=Wzg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAFZ_MY%2BQQnG2HG9j8kQDGZbLZREuFB4u_RvBsD_o-sccijGFyg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAFZ_MYJqKDRjWMZk%2BuA8ciLSi-W0U6_=gdV4FRKhz%2Bqb6o7qEw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonO2Fh1ziVo25Z=BxNHoOzW73TF4LycbQk8ZjL6z=_G=g@mail.gmail.com> <CAFZ_MY%2BQQnG2HG9j8kQDGZbLZREuFB4u_RvBsD_o-sccijGFyg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15 February 2013 18:21, PseudoCylon <moonlightakkiy@yahoo.ca> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: >> Hm, that sounds right, what's the code doing wrong? > > Currently, it seems the sta sends back ht params the ap included in a > PROBE_RESP packet. So, the ap could send ampdu packets bigger (in > byte) than the sta can handle or packet gaps are different from the > sta wants after ba session is created. (During ba session negotiation, > these params are not exchanged, only window sizes (frame count), seq > #, and token.) Right. yes, we should be negotiating the ampdu density to be the maximum of what the AP and STA can associate. Same deal with IBSS peers (and mesh peers too, eventually.) Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmokXVtzWLHEA=k0Fps7cRYFu%2BA82zk0gt4Y=iZsUyF=Wzg>