Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:56:43 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "Hartmann, O." <ohartman@mail.physik.uni-mainz.de> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance impact with SCHED_ULE in 5.1? Message-ID: <20031017165643.GF4717@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20031017141842.T84681@mail.physik.uni-mainz.de> References: <20031017141842.T84681@mail.physik.uni-mainz.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--A9z/3b/E4MkkD+7G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 02:24:29PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > On the production systems we use FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p10. >=20 > Does anybody recognized similar problems? FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE, and the ULE scheduler, are experimental works-in-progress. Significant ULE improvements have been made in 5.1-CURRENT and are ongoing. Kris --A9z/3b/E4MkkD+7G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/kB9LWry0BWjoQKURAulGAJ4qNNraUyy/tuOTgKIUoBh9ZYAwMwCgx/kV /sAMPMeaK73Ncwg80kyGbEA= =ompk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --A9z/3b/E4MkkD+7G--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031017165643.GF4717>