Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 10 May 2002 15:52:35 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
To:        Alan Cox <alc@cs.rice.edu>
Cc:        alpha@FreeBSD.ORG, jeff@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: gcc3 & alpha kernels
Message-ID:  <15580.9475.2695.221222@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20020510194133.GA13871@cs.rice.edu>
References:  <20020510194133.GA13871@cs.rice.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Alan Cox writes:
 > > I do NOT know if this was the fault of gcc3, but it smells like it.
 > > According to nm, this address is in _vm_object_allocate().  A few
 > > other times, it locked with an address in what looked like mlock().
 > 
 > A few days ago Jeff Robertson had a problem in this neighborhood
 > on alpha triggered by an atomic_cmpset_int() that I had introduced
 > in _vm_object_allocate().  He resolved with the following change
 > to src/sys/alpha/include/atomic.h:
 > 
 > Revision 1.12 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Wed May 8 05:19:56 2002 UTC (2 days, 13 hours ago) by jeff 
 > Branch: MAIN 
 > CVS Tags: HEAD 
 > Changes since 1.11: +2 -1 lines
 > Diff to previous 1.11 (colored)
 > 
 > zapnot the signed bits in atomic_cmpset_32.  Previously this did not work with
 > negative values because the original value was sign extended but the compared
 > value was not.
 > 
 > If I'm not mistaken, prior to this change, he locked up
 > in _vm_object_allocate() much as Andrew described.

Did Jeff see a lockup at boot?  Or was this on a running system?

FWIW, building with the older compile fixes the problem, so perhaps
the new compiler is somehow botching the atomic inlines.

Drew

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15580.9475.2695.221222>