Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Apr 2000 17:28:37 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Mikko T <mikko@dynas.se>
To:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: commit MAKE_SHELL?
Message-ID:  <200004251528.RAA29727@m2.dynas.se>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004231837560.46547-200000@green.dyndns.org>; from green@FreeBSD.ORG on Sun, Apr 23, 2000 at 06:51:16PM -0400 <20000425170951.A29390@happy.checkpoint.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Anatoly Vorobey:

>On Sun, Apr 23, 2000 at 06:51:16PM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:

>> I certainly don't mind adding more shells to the ${MAKE_SHELL} logic, but
>> so far have only done ksh because using pdksh as the ${MAKE_SHELL} does,
>> for me, result in about 10% faster make world time, and speeds port
>> building enormously 

>Do you have any guesses about what causes this speed increase? What does
>our shell suck at, in terms of speed? Maybe we could try and speed it up.

I compared some complex shell scripts on different platforms, albeit
quite a while back (FreeBSD 2.something, I think).  FreeBSD didn't do
too well, speedwise, mainly due to not having a built-in "test", thus
having to execute "/bin/test" (or "/bin/[") a lot.

       $.02,
       /Mikko


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200004251528.RAA29727>