Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 31 Mar 2018 20:21:18 +0200
From:      Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Mark Johnston <markj@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r331732 - head/sys/vm
Message-ID:  <20180331202118.5401ed2a@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
In-Reply-To: <201803291427.w2TEReA3024929@repo.freebsd.org>
References:  <201803291427.w2TEReA3024929@repo.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 14:27:40 +0000 (UTC) Mark Johnston <markj@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> Author: markj
> Date: Thu Mar 29 14:27:40 2018
> New Revision: 331732
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/331732
> 
> Log:
>   Fix the background laundering mechanism after r329882.
>   
>   Rather than using the number of inactive queue scans as a metric for
>   how many clean pages are being freed by the page daemon, have the
>   page daemon keep a running counter of the number of pages it has freed,
>   and have the laundry thread use that when computing the background
>   laundering threshold.
>   
>   Reviewed by:	kib
>   Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14884
> 
> Modified:
>   head/sys/vm/vm_pageout.c
>   head/sys/vm/vm_pagequeue.h
> 
> Modified: head/sys/vm/vm_pageout.c
> ==============================================================================
> --- head/sys/vm/vm_pageout.c	Thu Mar 29 13:55:23 2018	(r331731)
> +++ head/sys/vm/vm_pageout.c	Thu Mar 29 14:27:40 2018	(r331732)
> @@ -943,8 +943,7 @@ vm_pageout_laundry_worker(void *arg)
>  {
>  	struct vm_domain *vmd;
>  	struct vm_pagequeue *pq;
> -	uint64_t nclean, ndirty;
> -	u_int inactq_scans, last_launder;
> +	uint64_t nclean, ndirty, nfreed;
>  	int domain, last_target, launder, shortfall, shortfall_cycle, target;
>  	bool in_shortfall;
>  
> @@ -958,8 +957,7 @@ vm_pageout_laundry_worker(void *arg)
>  	in_shortfall = false;
>  	shortfall_cycle = 0;
>  	target = 0;
> -	inactq_scans = 0;
> -	last_launder = 0;
> +	nfreed = 0;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Calls to these handlers are serialized by the swap syscall lock.
> @@ -1000,7 +998,6 @@ vm_pageout_laundry_worker(void *arg)
>  			target = 0;
>  			goto trybackground;
>  		}
> -		last_launder = inactq_scans;
>  		launder = target / shortfall_cycle--;
>  		goto dolaundry;
>  
> @@ -1009,24 +1006,23 @@ vm_pageout_laundry_worker(void *arg)
>  		 * meet the conditions to perform background laundering:
>  		 *
>  		 * 1. The ratio of dirty to clean inactive pages exceeds the
> -		 *    background laundering threshold and the pagedaemon has
> -		 *    been woken up to reclaim pages since our last
> -		 *    laundering, or
> +		 *    background laundering threshold, or
>  		 * 2. we haven't yet reached the target of the current
>  		 *    background laundering run.
>  		 *
>  		 * The background laundering threshold is not a constant.
>  		 * Instead, it is a slowly growing function of the number of
> -		 * page daemon scans since the last laundering.  Thus, as the
> -		 * ratio of dirty to clean inactive pages grows, the amount of
> -		 * memory pressure required to trigger laundering decreases.
> +		 * clean pages freed by the page daemon since the last
> +		 * background laundering.  Thus, as the ratio of dirty to
> +		 * clean inactive pages grows, the amount of memory pressure
> +		 * required to trigger laundering decreases.
>  		 */
>  trybackground:
>  		nclean = vmd->vmd_free_count +
>  		    vmd->vmd_pagequeues[PQ_INACTIVE].pq_cnt;
>  		ndirty = vmd->vmd_pagequeues[PQ_LAUNDRY].pq_cnt;
> -		if (target == 0 && inactq_scans != last_launder &&
> -		    ndirty * isqrt(inactq_scans - last_launder) >= nclean) {
> +		if (target == 0 && ndirty * isqrt(nfreed /
> +		    (vmd->vmd_free_target - vmd->vmd_free_min)) >= nclean) {

I'm seeing big processes being killed with an "out of swap space" message
even though there's still plenty of swap available.  It seems to be fixed
by making this division round upwards:

		if (target == 0 && ndirty * isqrt((nfreed +
		    (vmd->vmd_free_target - vmd->vmd_free_min) - 1) /
		    (vmd->vmd_free_target - vmd->vmd_free_min)) >= nclean) {

I don't know where this formula comes from, so I don't know if this
change is correct.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180331202118.5401ed2a>