Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:07:22 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> To: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Subject: Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache Message-ID: <444E8F8A.9030409@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <005301c668ab$39c4c150$8b00a8c0@multiplay.co.uk> References: <20060425090739.8470143f.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <005301c668ab$39c4c150$8b00a8c0@multiplay.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Steven Hartland wrote: > Forget Intel and go for AMD who beat them hands down for DB work: > http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=2745 It will be interesting to see how Intels new CPUs (Conroe, Woodcrest, etc) will perform. From initial gaming benchmarks, they seems to outperform the current AMD offerings. But for current technology i agree, go for an Opteron system.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?444E8F8A.9030409>