Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 Jun 2013 20:37:55 +0700
From:      Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
To:        "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: hw.igb.num_queues default
Message-ID:  <51C305B3.7050703@grosbein.net>
In-Reply-To: <843F7891-FD87-4F16-A279-B45D4A674F4E@netapp.com>
References:  <843F7891-FD87-4F16-A279-B45D4A674F4E@netapp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20.06.2013 17:34, Eggert, Lars wrote:

> real memory  = 8589934592 (8192 MB)
> avail memory = 8239513600 (7857 MB)

> By default, the igb driver seems to set up one queue per detected CPU. Googling around, people seemed to suggest that limiting the number of queues makes things work better. I can confirm that setting hw.igb.num_queues=2 seems to have fixed the issue. (Two was the first value I tried, maybe other values other than 0 would work, too.)
> 
> In order to uphold POLA, should the igb driver maybe default to a conservative value for hw.igb.num_queues that may not deliver optimal performance, but at least works out of the box?

Or, better, make nmbclusters auto-tuning smarter, if any.
I mean, use more nmbclusters for machines with large amounts of memory.

Eugene Grosbein





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51C305B3.7050703>