Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2006 21:34:54 -0400 From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] semaphore usage "port based"? Message-ID: <26796.1144028094@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <20060402222843.X947@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20060402163504.T947@ganymede.hub.org> <25422.1144016604@sss.pgh.pa.us> <25526.1144017388@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20060402213921.V947@ganymede.hub.org> <26524.1144026385@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20060402222843.X947@ganymede.hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes: > On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Tom Lane wrote: >> OK, could we see strace (or whatever BSD calls it) output for the second >> postmaster? I'd like to see exactly what results it's getting for the >> kernel calls it makes during IpcSemaphoreCreate. > 'k, dont' know what strace is ... we have ktrace and truss ... truss is > what I usually use, and is: truss seems to have an output format closer to what I'm used to, but either will do. regards, tom lane
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?26796.1144028094>