Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:21:44 -0500
From:      John Almberg <jalmberg@identry.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Old user can't log in
Message-ID:  <9B40B0B0-FC12-4BBB-BC7D-5BE17BF226FC@identry.com>
In-Reply-To: <1234506087.13067.123.camel@laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au>
References:  <325E4EC8-BD2B-45C1-978C-4922D16D3A94@identry.com> <9391FD2D-59ED-455A-8C87-2854C7EF1E52@mac.com> <ECDF6933-47F6-4D67-AC5C-5E149590D971@identry.com> <1234498626.13067.96.camel@laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au> <470E75B0-C7E9-4F05-A112-62DF01F1EA1D@mac.com> <1234500741.13067.111.camel@laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au> <F8CE7DF3-3991-4AB1-9AEA-FB667A82F01C@mac.com> <1234506087.13067.123.camel@laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Feb 13, 2009, at 1:21 AM, Da Rock wrote:

> On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 21:52 -0800, Chuck Swiger wrote:
>> On Feb 12, 2009, at 8:52 PM, Da Rock wrote:
>>>> With reasonable organization, and appropriate use of sudo or setgid
>>>> binaries for things like people who use SVN or CVS, there generally
>>>> isn't reason or need for a user to be in so many groups.  For the
>>>> exceptional cases, switching to using a full ACL system rather than
>>>> the traditional Unix permission model is probably going to be a
>>>> better
>>>> solution.
>>>
>>> Interesting. What would you suggest for full ACL?
>>
>> Well, it depends on what you're doing in terms of user requirements
>> and systems (ie, are the FreeBSD boxes fileservers, clients, or
>> both?), but the stuff which comes with FreeBSD is documented in
>> acl(3), getfacl, setfacl, etc.  Other choices might involve something
>> like the Andrew File System / Transarc DFS stuff, or Windows Active
>> Directory and Samba/CIFS on the FreeBSD boxes....
>>
>> Regards,
>
> So you're talking in terms of the FS only? I thought you said the  
> kernel
> wasn't capable? I'll have to look into this a more thoroughly, I'm
> intrigued to say the least. Not to say I'll ever probably use it,  
> but it
> does present a limitation.

I only ran up against the problem because I added this user to a  
bunch of other user's groups, so that she could edit those user's  
files. Easily refactored into something more sensible.

-- John




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9B40B0B0-FC12-4BBB-BC7D-5BE17BF226FC>