Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 14:04:59 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: Jacques Vidrine <nectar@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-vuxml@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: making <description> optional Message-ID: <20040825140459.36c75b42@localhost.pittgoth.com> In-Reply-To: <825857C8-F6B4-11D8-9236-000A95BC6FAE@FreeBSD.org> References: <86914F26-F516-11D8-8CAA-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> <825857C8-F6B4-11D8-9236-000A95BC6FAE@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:33:34 -0500 Jacques Vidrine <nectar@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Aug 23, 2004, at 10:10 AM, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > > I have a supplementary databases that are as much `personal' as vuxml > > is. The portaudit text database has been announced and documented as > > mentioned in a previous discussion. > > I'm sorry, I couldn't find that text (`Please contact [...]') anywhere > in portaudit.txt or related files. Now I realize that is generated in > the pages at ~eik/portaudit. I think we're on the same page now. > > > Anyway, I think making the entry optional would be the best solution, > > but if you prefer a placeholder, we can keep `Please contact the > > FreeBSD Security Team for more information'. > > I prefer an actual description, but OK :-) > > > Whatever you like. Simply using dummy values is fine with me. > > For the sake of harmony, let's agree that setting > <discovery>unknown</discovery> is acceptable for now. Gimme a few days > to check that stuff doesn't break when processing said entry. Ok, so we're on our way to closing this entire discussion. I seen Oliver's wishlist but have been too busy to reply. I'll try to get it done in the next few days. Thanks guys! -- Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040825140459.36c75b42>