Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 01:44:53 -0400 From: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG> To: David Hill <david@phobia.ms> Cc: audit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: posix and C99 Message-ID: <20010915014453.A32559@coffee.q9media.com> In-Reply-To: <005901c13d9a$a2dc77a0$0201a8c0@hill.hom>; from david@phobia.ms on Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 11:58:09PM -0400 References: <005901c13d9a$a2dc77a0$0201a8c0@hill.hom>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Hill <david@phobia.ms> writes: > Does FreeBSD keep up with C99 and POSIX 1.g standards? There are > functions in each that are not implemented in FreeBSD. It's hard to see why this was posted to -audit, but yes we generally try to be as standards compliant as possible. Patches are welcome. Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010915014453.A32559>