Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 30 May 2003 11:22:16 -0400
From:      Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
To:        peo@intersonic.se
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Vinum performance
Message-ID:  <3ED77728.8080009@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <3ED74FF4.2010905@intersonic.se>
References:  <3ED72156.1070905@intersonic.se> <20030530101845.GG40976@wantadilla.lemis.com> <3ED74FF4.2010905@intersonic.se>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
[ ... ]
> The bottleneck is write performance, reading from the documentation this 
> is normally a weak point in Vinum/raid5 setups.

It's not vinum; RAID-5 write performance is going to be relatively slow even 
with hardware parity/XOR support.

> The volume will be used for storing temporary files with sizes in the 
> 1-4MB range, a few hundreds at a time. Reads are fine but writes a bit 
> slow.

What ratio of reads to writes do you expect?

> Copying 170 files total 319MB TO the Vinum volume takes about 2m45s.
> Copying same files FROM the Vinum volume to another volume on a hardware 
> raid5 controller takes 43s.

A 3-1 ratio in speeds for software RAID-5 versus hardware doesn't strike me as 
being very wrong....

> This machine is not in production yet so I can still make changes to the 
> configuration. The current block size is 16384 and the stripe size 419k. 
> I assume it would be a good idea to change that to for example 491,520?

...or try a few stripe sizes, such as 64K or 128K.

-Chuck




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3ED77728.8080009>