Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 16:55:28 -0500 (EST) From: vogelke+software@pobox.com (Karl Vogel) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5 TB server Message-ID: <20081128215528.35F4BB7C5@kev.msw.wpafb.af.mil> In-Reply-To: <20081128212753.D6715@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> (message from Wojciech Puchar on Fri, 28 Nov 2008 21:28:51 %2B0100 (CET)) References: <20081128194531.7B17FB7C5@kev.msw.wpafb.af.mil> <20081128212753.D6715@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:45:31 -0500, >> I spewed something along the lines of: K> In my experience, completely new filesystems or operating systems need at K> least 5 years in the field to weed out all the weird corner-cases. I might K> trust ZFS on Sun hardware (*with* vendor support) at this point, but I'd K> wait awhile before trying it on anything else. >> On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 21:28:51 +0100, >> Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> said: W> if it will ever be good filesystem, it will be no longer ZFS. just the W> ideas is in big part wrong. I'm not trying to start a religious war, but at least one idea in ZFS is worth its weight in platinum: end-to-end file-integrity checks. ZFS can (and does) find and correct file errors introduced by disk firmware and media problems. With the sheer volume of stuff being stored these days, that capability (in any filesystem) is going to be crucial. -- Karl Vogel I don't speak for the USAF or my company I think that's how Chicago got started. A bunch of people in New York said, "Gee, I'm enjoying the crime and the poverty, but it just isn't cold enough. Let's go west." --Richard Jeni
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081128215528.35F4BB7C5>