Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:38:03 -0700
From:      Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To:        Andrew Thompson <thompsa@freebsd.org>, Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Where is thr_getscheduler
Message-ID:  <20060801213803.GB9583@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20060801212742.GB13841@heff.fud.org.nz>
References:  <20060801204501.GA19647@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0608011657040.1810@sea.ntplx.net> <20060801211657.GA29737@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20060801212742.GB13841@heff.fud.org.nz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 09:27:42AM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> >  
> > +20060713:
> > +    David Xu updated libthr to use thr_getscheduler(), which is
> > +    present in libc.so.7 but not libc.so.6.  This change wreaks
> > +    havoc on installed ports that use libthr and that are linked 
> > +    against libc.so.6.  It is suggested that one update their 
> > +    installed ports.
> > +
> 
> This is uncalled for, you should running stable if you dont want to deal
> with the changes in the latest working sources.

I do run stable on other systems, and I'm well prepared to
deal with problems on -current.  The problem is that there is
no notice in UPDATING the this problem exists.  If UPDATING
had a proper notice, I would have updated on a Saturday 
when I could afford down time.

-- 
Steve



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060801213803.GB9583>