Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 08:29:48 +0200 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: joe@via.net (Joe McGuckin) Subject: Re: Multiple kernel src trees? Message-ID: <19970914082948.KW01034@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970913194151.18063A-100000@enteract.com>; from Ken Stox on Sep 13, 1997 19:43:24 -0500 References: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970913194151.18063A-100000@enteract.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Ken Stox wrote: > >Can I have multiple kernel src trees on a single machine? > >Are all the include files using relative paths? > > Sure, no problem. Look at /usr/src/release/Makefile. Warning, you'll > chew up alot of space with redundant obj's and binaries. Huh? He's talking about *kernel* trees. There's not very much overhead, perhaps 15 MB of .o files. But that's the same if you have multiple kernel compile directories in a single kernel source tree. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970914082948.KW01034>