Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Jul 2013 10:52:07 -0400
From:      J David <j.david.lists@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Bind in FreeBSD, security advisories
Message-ID:  <CABXB=RQEiDrdJ7t6G5_S2SQNHzhqeoq7%2BmW0WOWZjN2E92HA=w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1375193921.29380.3269347.48BF24A6@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References:  <CAO%2BPfDctepQY0mGH7H%2BgOSm4HJwhe-RCND%2BmxAArnRxpWiCsjg@mail.gmail.com> <1375186900.23467.3223791.24CB348A@webmail.messagingengine.com> <51F7B5C7.6050008@digsys.bg> <CAOgwaMt4G02yhU0cbiq_EEwhi4=mgt2kLGJf0Rgb8t9wECsGJA@mail.gmail.com> <51F7C07C.9060606@digsys.bg> <1375193086.25610.3260371.08421FD0@webmail.messagingengine.com> <op.w01ga50n8527sy@ronaldradial.versatec.local> <1375193921.29380.3269347.48BF24A6@webmail.messagingengine.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Half the people will say:

"There should be more stuff in base!"

The other half will say:

"There should be less stuff in base!"

People don't generally change each other's minds about this because
they start from competing definitions of what is good that are 100%
opinion in nature.

(Spoken as a hardcore advocate of "There should be less stuff in base!")

DNS client and DNS server functionality are quite different, and it
would be swell if there were a set of BIND-independent client tools
that were part of the base so that BIND could, at a minimum, be left
out via WITH_BIND=no in src.conf or similar without producing a
crippled system.  And/or people could install the DNS server of their
choice (whether unbound or BIND or whatever) using pkg.

If there isn't one already readily available, I might even volunteer
to help develop that set of client tools at such time as FreeBSD
coding standards allow C++11 in the tree. :)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CABXB=RQEiDrdJ7t6G5_S2SQNHzhqeoq7%2BmW0WOWZjN2E92HA=w>