Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:25:42 +0200 From: peter@bgnett.no (Peter N. M. Hansteen) To: racerx@makeworld.com Cc: Fafa Diliha Romanova <fteg@london.com> Subject: Re: HELP ME WITH PF! (5th plea) Message-ID: <86sm1at2ex.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> In-Reply-To: <4271EE24.9050303@makeworld.com> (Chris's message of "Fri, 29 Apr 2005 03:19:48 -0500") References: <20050428181754.88B914BEAE@ws1-1.us4.outblaze.com> <86sm1artvh.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> <4271EE24.9050303@makeworld.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chris <racerx@makeworld.com> writes: >> You could try running ftpsesame or pftpx instead. > > Why not simply use sftp? That would be a bit smarter in quite a few cases, certainly. I'm no fan of ftp myself, but there are circumstances where you need to accomodate users' perceived needs. That's where little bits of ftp through NAT and/or firewalls magic comes in very handy. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/ "First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86sm1at2ex.fsf>