Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:30:01 -0800 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: git@freebsd.org Subject: Re: code review in git: git & phabricator? Message-ID: <CAF6rxgmkwsZOcXXhHt-gguKcAwOGJmyRMuM1467VhMag%2BHS_EQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfoEwU%2BaKUY3syCXfa3rbWeDT5TrBYQe2e2zHkGVB_6e3w@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAF6rxgmr6TZZM8_WCe8rpG3SsN9rr3R4REA1CrTM2ktkFD2HDw@mail.gmail.com> <CANCZdfoEwU%2BaKUY3syCXfa3rbWeDT5TrBYQe2e2zHkGVB_6e3w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 at 10:28, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 9:15 AM Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> What's the plan for git & phabricator? Will we continue to be >> supporting the phabricator workflow when we use git? Is this short >> term or long term? >> >> Either way phabric-admin@ has some configuration to do so a heads up >> during the conversion of future repos would be appreciated. > > > Short term: no change. We're just switching from svn to git which is disr= uptive enough in a 'death of a thousand cuts' kind of way. > Long term: who knows, but there will almost certainly be changes as diffe= rent workflows are worked out. There's such a huge diversity of options and= opinions, I'm unsure if we'll reach consensus on change quickly and a peri= od of experimentation likely will follow. Thanks for the info! While I've been less active lately as a comitter I do have experience with both the project as well as the capabilities of the various tooling (phabricator, github, git, jenkins, etc.). Feel free to CC me if you y'all ever need help figuring out what makes sense or what's possible. --=20 Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgmkwsZOcXXhHt-gguKcAwOGJmyRMuM1467VhMag%2BHS_EQ>