Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 Jan 1999 14:46:48 -0500
From:      "James A. Mutter" <jm7996@devrycols.edu>
To:        Kevin Weiss <kevin.weiss@mail.utexas.edu>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: general CPU question and FreeBSD...
Message-ID:  <3.0.5.32.19990128144648.007cc320@devrycols.edu>
In-Reply-To: <199901281602.IAA04649@hub.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:03 AM 1/28/99 -0600, Kevin Weiss wrote:
>After taking the longest time to get my
>kernel configured the way I wanted,
>I noticed that my CPU_TYPE had
>to be "i586" for my AMD-K6 233MHz.

Correct.

>After looking through some 
>documentation, I noticed that FreeBSD
>says that an"i686" is like a Pentium Pro.

i686 isn't 'like' a Pentium Pro - it _is_ a Pentium Pro.  To my knowledge,
none of the Intel clones have incorporated the 686 instructions on their
chips.  The system won't boot if you call your AMD a 686.

>I was (and have been) under the impression
>that a K6 was 686 architecture.  Am I wrong?
>Or is this the FreeBSD recognizes socket 7
>CPU's? If I used a K6-2 in my system, would it
>also fall under the category of "i586"?

Yes, most definately.

It's nothing to worry about though - the K6/2 is a mighty fast processor,
FreeBSD likes it just fine.

Good luck.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.5.32.19990128144648.007cc320>