Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 Aug 2000 15:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org>
Cc:        arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Turning tcp_extensions back on?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008101541410.63235-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20000810141253.A2550@kilt.nothing-going-on.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Nik Clayton wrote:

> [ Background -- NetCraft, the server statistics people, are about to start
>   producing reports where they figure out the uptime of the server's they're
>   talking to.  I was talking to one of their engineers yesterday, and he
>   mentioned that FreeBSD doesn't work well with this, because most of the
>   deployed systems keep tcp_extensions turned off, and they use the RFC1323
>   extensions to do the report.  Obviously, if it's still an issue then we
>   should keep them turned off (and probably prepare some sort of text that
>   NetCraft can send out with the reports which explains why FreeBSD doesn't
>   figure very well in the report.  Alternatively, if it's not a problem
>   any more then we should turn them on. ]

Turning them on now won't help servers with 2 year uptimes unless they
toggle the sysctl manually (not likely), or, uh, upgrade and reboot ;-)

Kris

--
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
    -- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0008101541410.63235-100000>