Date: 26 Jun 1999 14:05:03 +0200 From: Frode Vatvedt Fjeld <frodef@acm.org> To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bt848 channel frequencies Message-ID: <2hvhcb9ngw.fsf@dslab7.cs.uit.no> In-Reply-To: Randall Hopper's message of "Fri, 25 Jun 1999 19:00:08 -0400" References: <Frode <2hzp2tfr3t.fsf@dslab7.cs.uit.no> <374AA5BB.7C87D8C2@cs.strath.ac.uk> <2hogj9f0p6.fsf@dslab7.cs.uit.no> <3.0.6.32.19990626090820.007ad510@alicia.nttmcl.com> <2hemj0b617.fsf@dslab7.cs.uit.no> <2hzp2tfr3t.fsf@dslab7.cs.uit.no> <374AA5BB.7C87D8C2@cs.strath.ac.uk> <2hogj9f0p6.fsf@dslab7.cs.uit.no> <2hpv2kba67.fsf@dslab7.cs.uit.no> <19990625190008.A2443@ipass.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Randall Hopper <aa8vb@ipass.net> writes: > 1) Once we have libtv, we quit passing channel numbers to the driver. > We only pass it frequencies (that's the whole point I believe :-). Right on.. :) > [...] > 4) So it seems to me there are 2 levels of mapping that libtv needs to > handle: > > StationName -to- Frequency Name (configurable locally) > FrequencyName -to- Frequency (doesn't need configured) So you are saying that these are actually two more or less independent types of mappings that should be separated in the database and the API? That would give this scenario for anyone starting to use their new TV-card: 1. chose the frequency-name -> frequency mapping table 2. chose the station-name -> frequency-name mapping table ..and that the second mapping table is useless without the first (if a basic frequency is what you are after). -- Frode Vatvedt Fjeld To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2hvhcb9ngw.fsf>