Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 15 Jul 2000 15:37:40 +0900
From:      itojun@iijlab.net
To:        Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
Cc:        ARIGA Seiji <say@sfc.wide.ad.jp>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, lconrad@Go2France.com, kris@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: IPsec Performance (Re: Merge of KAME code)
Message-ID:  <7693.963643060@coconut.itojun.org>
In-Reply-To: silby's message of Fri, 14 Jul 2000 18:02:40 EST. <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007141800280.11600-100000@achilles.silby.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>> And the results are about,
>> 
>>   TCP STREAM TEST   UDP STREAM TEST
>>     NONE:   60Mbps    NONE:   94Mbps
>>     AH:     23Mbps    AH:     30Mbps
>>     ESP:    11Mbps    ESP:    11Mbps
>>     AH+ESP:  8Mbps    AH+ESP:  9Mbps
>> 
>> P.S. The same tests with IPv6 produced almost the same results.
>> 
>> // ARIGA Seiji
>
>Question.  Is the time spent in the IPSec layer accounted to the user
>processor, or just thrown in with kernel time?

	the current IPsec code does encryption (like actual DES/3DES encryption
	of the packet) in the kernel, so it will appear as kernel time.

itojun


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7693.963643060>