Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 25 Nov 2021 16:31:10 +0100 (CET)
From:      freebsd@oldach.net (Helge Oldach)
To:        allanjude@freebsd.org (Allan Jude)
Cc:        manu@bidouilliste.com, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-src-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-src-branches@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: git: 32a2fed6e71f - stable/13 - openssl: Fix detection of ARMv7 and ARM64 CPU features
Message-ID:  <202111251531.1APFVBK9039510@nuc.oldach.net>
In-Reply-To: <1a76eb2e-b9f0-946e-c80b-e6bc9e258d59@freebsd.org> from Allan Jude at "25 Nov 2021 10:09:25"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Allan Jude wrote on Thu, 25 Nov 2021 16:09:25 +0100 (CET):
> On 11/25/2021 2:38 AM, Helge Oldach wrote:
> > hmo@p48 ~ $ for f in 0 1 2 3 8 16 32 64 128 ; do echo -n $f:; env OPENSSL_armcap=$f openssl speed -evp aes-256-gcm 2>&1 | tail -1 | cut -wf7; done
> > 0:42295.15k
> > 1:23891.19k
> > 2:42208.57k
> > 3:23970.56k
> > 8:42354.98k
> > 16:42199.06k
> > 32:size
> > Illegal instruction (core dumped)
> > 64:42322.42k
> > 128:42275.00k
> > hmo@p48 ~ $
> > 
> > So I guess HWCAP_FP is the culprit? Maybe related to hard/soft floating
> > point math which indeed is kind of special on the Pi?
> 
> So yeah, the issue seems to be that floating point on the RPi4 is slower 
> than not, but now openssl (properly) detects that the CPU advertises 
> support for it.
> 
> As seen elsewhere in the thread, most other ARM platforms get a very 
> significant speed boost.

So can we disable FP within OpenSSL for the RPi by default? This commit
basically introduced a regression for this platform and I think that
should be fixed.

Or it the root cause a suboptimal FP implementation that is not adequate
for the RPi?

Kind regards
Helge



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?202111251531.1APFVBK9039510>