Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:26:50 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> To: Jan Beich <jbeich@freebsd.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r484868 - head/graphics/azpainter Message-ID: <20181113122650.GA42216@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <36s5-fa3k-wny@FreeBSD.org> References: <201811131020.wADAKkDd074298@repo.freebsd.org> <36s5-fa3k-wny@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 01:14:23PM +0100, Jan Beich wrote: > Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > New Revision: 484868 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/484868 > > > > Log: > > Try to unbreak the build on architectures that still use old GCC as their > > system compiler by using contemporary GCC version. > > > > Tested on: powerpc > [...] > > +.include <bsd.port.pre.mk> > > ARCH is defined in bsd.port.options.mk, so pre/post.mk could've been > avoided. I'll look into it, thanks. > > +.if ${ARCH:Mpowerpc*} || ${ARCH} == sparc64 > > +USE_GCC= yes > > +.endif > > Why not USES=compiler:c++11-lang? mips* and riscv64 are also GCC-only atm. Because seeing "c++11-lang" in pure C program is confusing? I don't know much knowledge about those arches so I didn't include them. It would be nice to specify "GCC-4.2.1 does not cut it" without having to spell C++11. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20181113122650.GA42216>