Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 11:28:55 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bulding libc.so with gnu99 is dangerous! Message-ID: <20030614112527.S19455@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20030613220359.GA4596@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20030613154052.GA62356@nagual.pp.ru> <20030613194427.GA42459@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030613215307.GA43462@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030613220359.GA4596@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 14:53:07 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > This isn't a bug report. The mail server I am writing this from, and the > > laptop I am using to log into it from; are running with a stock world and > > I can't repeat your problem. > > Exact steps are (on i386-current from Jun 1, cvsupped to recent, includes > installed): > > setenv CSTD gnu99 > cd /usr/src/lib/libc; make; make install > (using compiler builded at Jun 1) > > This is not stock world bug report, since recent world have c99 instead of > gnu99 on i386. This is about dangerous gnu99 option on i386. As reported previously, "CSTD=gnu99 make" in lib/msun breaks things in a more obvious way (at compile time). std=gnu99 apparently breaks __CONCAT(). Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030614112527.S19455>