Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 05:21:57 -0700 From: Thomas Stephens <tas@stephens.org> To: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@internetcds.com> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Thomas Stephens <tas@stephens.org> Subject: Re: Some ideas on the evolution of -CURRENT Message-ID: <199904121221.NAA00464@stephens.ml.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 11 Apr 1999 20:49:16 PDT." <Pine.BSF.4.05.9904112039130.19480-100000@schizo.cdsnet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jaye Mathisen wrote: > >11) Movement of SMB support into the kernel, rather than a user process >for maximum performance. (Gotta kick NT's butt, and wouldn't mind dusting >Linux in the process). This is something I'd like, and I'm willing to make an effort to contribute if I can (I'll have to look at what's involved). Unfortunately, Sharity Light is under the GPL (as is the Linux SMBFS), so an SMB/CIFS filesystem would presumably have to be built from the ground up. Apart from the (expired) draft spec, any pointers to CIFS resources which aren't restrictively licensed? Thomas Stephens tas@stephens.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904121221.NAA00464>