Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 08 Jun 2017 06:20:58 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 132302] [patch] smbutil(1): contrib/smbfs subr.c: saved passwords >18 char fail
Message-ID:  <bug-132302-8-fFYGpKjAeL@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-132302-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-132302-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D132302

--- Comment #5 from Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> ---
(In reply to Josh Paetzel from comment #3)
I was thinking last night about the proposed patch and wanted to modify it,=
 but
now it's committed already before I could put hands on the keyboard;

the problem (bug) was that the value in 'pos' for the XOR operation:

        ch ^=3D pos;

at some point exceeds, when the to be crypted password is long enough, exce=
eds
one byte, and so does the result in 'ch'; later the value from 'ch' is form=
ated
to a hex string with

       sprintf(dst, "%02x", ch);
       dst +=3D 2;

which gives in 'dst' four new bytes, like 0136, but the pointer 'dst' is on=
ly
moved two byte further; this damages the resulting string in 'dst' for the
crypted pw and later decrypt goes wrong;

Said this, the test for 'pos' not exceeding one byte must be=20

        if (pos >=3D 256)=20
            pos -=3D256;'

because a pw of 57 bytes lenth will hit the point where 'pos' is exactly 256
(0x100);

57++ bytes is a very unlikely password, but as it s stored into a file and =
not
typed in from time to time it's not impossible thinking in such a beast;

sorry to come late with this comment;

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-132302-8-fFYGpKjAeL>