Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:44:07 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_descrip.c Message-ID: <46A62C57.5010802@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20070724153608.GH96643@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <200707032126.l63LQ7ea027929@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070703142714.F552@10.0.0.1> <20070723201642.GC96643@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <46A54A0B.4000109@elischer.org> <20070724153608.GH96643@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 05:38:35PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: >> I think that is the wrong question.. >> the question is "why do we drop off after 8?" >> which I'm sure Jeff is already working on. > > Actually since the workbench has been run on an 8-core amd64 and that > both Linux and FreeBSD drop here, I thought it was natural to get the > best performance with 8 threads... Am I wrong? The ideal situation would be to reach a peak at 8 and stay there. > Regards,
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46A62C57.5010802>