Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:38:44 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> Cc: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@web.de> Subject: Re: bin/72138: libc.so.5 isn't installed in a safe way Message-ID: <20040928173844.GE18611@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <m3d606gw8o.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> References: <20040927224353.845381B217@merlin.emma.line.org> <20040928043351.GA2400@frontfree.net> <20040928071758.GB14942@ip.net.ua> <m31xgmzt34.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> <20040928153537.GA3185@frontfree.net> <m3d606gw8o.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--qOrJKOH36bD5yhNe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 07:05:11PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > Xin LI <delphij@frontfree.net> writes: >=20 > > So I personally prefer we have -S for the shared libraries (as Ruslan's > > patch did) - and give our user community the choose of whether to have > > INSTALL=3Dinstall -S in their make.conf. > > > > What do you think about this? >=20 > It is important that a failing "make installworld" doesn't leave a > non-working system behind. I don't care much about temporary files left > over. >=20 It's rather impossible to guarantee, but we do our best (by first installing libraries, then binaries, etc.). Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --qOrJKOH36bD5yhNe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBWaGkqRfpzJluFF4RAtreAJ43UleethaebpSKgJ03iO1CNcUuZACeKchQ uo1u1PBXB/vsVKFFTVwIp9w= =aI6J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qOrJKOH36bD5yhNe--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040928173844.GE18611>