Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 07:50:21 +0100 From: Joerg Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre@citeweb.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: malloc.h Message-ID: <20011108075021.P43204@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <200111080020.fA80Kpd99323@gits.dyndns.org>; from clefevre@citeweb.net on Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 01:20:50AM %2B0100 References: <200111072045.fA7KjLP70989@uriah.heep.sax.de> <200111080020.fA80Kpd99323@gits.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > > #if __STDC__ > > this statement is wrong. That's a claim without an explanation. > it should be > > #ifdef __STDC__ That would be wrong. __STDC__ could be defined to 0 which means ``not compliant to the standard''. > #if (__STDC__-0) == 0 What is the difference to my version (except that it would fail for __STDC__ being greater than 1)? I don't know how pre-ANSI cpps did behave, but at least a standard-conformant cpp must replace any identifier in an #if statement that remains after macro expansion by 0L. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011108075021.P43204>