Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 00:49:41 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: "Jack L. Stone" <jackstone@sage-one.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with my startup script? Message-ID: <20021219224941.GC598@gothmog.gr> In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20021219161956.013b44a0@mail.sage-one.net> References: <3.0.5.32.20021219154527.013b44a0@mail.sage-one.net> <002001c2a77f$f40db760$6f00000a@5adam5> <002001c2a77f$f40db760$6f00000a@5adam5> <3.0.5.32.20021219154527.013b44a0@mail.sage-one.net> <3.0.5.32.20021219161956.013b44a0@mail.sage-one.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2002-12-19 16:19, "Jack L. Stone" <jackstone@sage-one.net> wrote: > At 11:59 PM 12.19.2002 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >> >Quick fix: > >> > # chmod 0750 /usr/local/etc/rc.d/smbfsstartup.sh > >> > >> Pardon moir for chiming in here, but I have noticed 3 different posts about > >> the proper chmod for the executable on this thread: 744, 755 and now 750 [...] > > > >The more conservative, the better, I guess. The `correct' permission > >set is the one that fits the local policies. [...] > > Then, wouldn't 0700 be the very strict and most conservative way if only > root is intended to only to use the script -- usually in the bootup > scenario? I don't know. It's up to you to choose. That was the main thing I tried to write in that previous post. Sorry for being a bit vague... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021219224941.GC598>